More articles in Guides

Refresh Rate vs PWM Rate

Refresh Rate vs PWM Rate article image


Refresh rates are different to PWM rates, and both play an important role in your design and which pixel protocol you choose to use. Talk to our lighting specialists today to learn more.

The Two Rates in Context

Your pixel light system can be broken down into many stages of data transmission. All stages from the sending software through to the pixel chips themselves can affect the overall refresh rate. The PWM rate is only affected by the output of the IC chip used in the pixel LEDs.

To put this in the context of a pixel system, everything before the dotted line in this image can affect Refresh Rate; everything after the dotted line will affect PWM Rate.

Refresh Rate vs PWM Rate Graphic 1 - Advatek Lighting

Refresh Rate vs PWM Rate Graphic 1

Sending Software Frame Rate

Generally, software that is used to generate and send data to your PixLite LED controller will group this data into frames. Each frame consists of a specific instruction for each pixel that is configured – telling each one what color and how bright it should be. There may be many “universes” of data in each frame. Whilst it can be very fast to transmit the frame over the network, it normally takes more time for the software to generate the pattern / lighting data compared to how long it takes to send. The time it takes the sending software to generate and send one frame will have an impact on the maximum frame rate the system can achieve.

Some lighting software will have an option for you to specify the frame rate you wish to use. If there is no option for this, the software may set its own frame rate based on its performance, or it may use a variable output rate.

The maximum frame rate of the sending software may be dependent on configuration and efficiency of the software you are using, as well as the hardware you are running it on.

Overall Refresh Rate

After the data is transmitted by the sending software, it is processed by the network, then the PixLite LED controller, and finally the pixel lights. Each one of these stages will take some time. As these add up, the total amount of time it takes the data to travel from the sending software through to the pixel lights will result in a slight delay. This delay is called latency.

The overall refresh rate of your pixel display will depend primarily on the frame rate of your sending software, as long as the total latency does not prohibit this. For example, if the pixels you are using have a slow data rate which takes a long time for the PixLite to send out, this latency may result in an overall system refresh rate that cannot keep up with the sending software’s frame rate.

A faster refresh rate is better, allowing for quick and dynamic changes to the pixels to create a system that can display any effect you could imagine. A low refresh rate might result in content that doesn’t look as smooth as it should. There are many factors that can affect the overall refresh rate – for more information, see the article: Refresh Rate.

Dithering with Pixlite Mk3

One of the major benefits of using a PixLite Mk3 pixel controller is the ability to enable dithering on the outgoing pixel data stream. This effectively allows the resolution of 8-bit pixels to be doubled, as if they were 9-bit, creating more colors that we can use.

To do this, pixel data must be output at very fast speeds – above 100 FPS, and the outgoing pixel frame rate must be at least twice the incoming frame rate. For more information. see the article: Dithering & Gamma Correction.

By designing a system to have a high pixel frame rate, and a high overall refresh rate, you can achieve a higher quality display.

What is a PWM?

When pixel chips use the data that they receive to dim the LED itself, they normally utilize a method of dimming called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). The LEDs are driven with a waveform that rapidly turns them on and off. The duration of the ‘on’ time and ‘off’ time can be altered by the chip, allowing the LEDs to spend a specific amount of time on, compared to off. A PWM signal is generated for each LED, allowing each color of each pixel to be modified independently.

Refresh Rate vs PWM Rate Graphic 2

Refresh Rate vs PWM Rate Graphic 2

How Humans Perceive a PWM

The PWM signal operates at a very high frequency – so high that the human eye cannot perceive these changes. Instead, our eyes see the average of these signals. This means that, if a 50% intensity is required, then the ‘on’ and ‘off’ times should be the same. To increase this perceived intensity, the ‘on’ time simply needs to be increased, and the ‘off’ time decreased.

Another interesting trick that our eyes play on us is that we don’t perceive light linearly. If a pixel light increases in intensity from 0% to 100% at a constant rate, we will see the first increases in intensity as larger changes. This leads to the reason why gamma correction is useful – it alters the curve to which pixels are dimmed, so that we perceive them to dim much more smoothly. Lighting designers should take this into account, as dimming curves should look smooth to an audience.

The rate at which a PWM signal is repeated is called the PWM Rate. Pixel lights with a higher PWM rate can outperform budget-grade lights when camera footage is important, such as shows, light displays, architectural façades and many more.

What Determines the Rate of a PWM?

The PWM rate is a fixed rate that is solely dependent on the type of pixels you are using. The IC chips that drive each pixel normally generate a PWM signal at a fixed frequency, regardless of the incoming data. This means that the only factor that affects PWM rate is the design of the pixel lights themselves. Protocols such as MBI6020 and SK9822 offer incredibly high PWM rates, while others are limited to a low PWM rate. Selecting the right pixel is critical for your design.

PixLite LED controllers provide support for most pixel protocols on the market. If you need help with this, the team of lighting specialists at Advatek can help you determine which one might be best for your installation.

Refresh Rate vs PWM Rate Graphic 3

Refresh Rate vs PWM Rate Graphic 3

How Cameras are Affected

Similar to how the human eye can only perceive changes that are slow enough to detect, a camera will operate at a specific frame rate, and will perceive PWM oscillations only if the PWM rate is low. Depending on what camera your pixel display will be filmed with, your PWM Rate might need to be higher than budget-grade pixels.

The standard rule-of-thumb is that the PWM of your pixels should be at least 30 times the frame rate of the camera. For example, if a 60FPS camera is being used, then the PWM rate of your pixels should be at least 30 times this – 1800Hz. WS2812B has a PWM rate of 400Hz, so this will result in flickering footage. A higher-end pixel, such as SK9822 has a PWM rate of 4700Hz – much higher than the minimum rate, which will ensure flicker-free footage.

For more information on this rule-of-thumb, and other contexts this is useful in, see this article from the CEO of Creamsource, an industry leader in Film and TV.

Consult Your Lighting Specialists at Advatek

Both Refresh Rates and PWM Rates have the potential to make your pixel lights look incredible or mediocre. Reach out to the team of lighting specialists at Advatek to learn more about how to design a pixel display, and how a PixLite LED controller can bring you the quality you need.